I think you do your readers a disservice by stating these as facts when the age of the formation has still not been verified. Yes the stones are over 10,000 years old, but no evidence of the formation being that old.
Non of your references mention with any certainty what you have claimed as fact in the first sentence of your paragraph..
It sure is an amazing looking possibility.
I think you do your readers a disservice by stating these as facts when the age of the formation has still not been verified. Yes the stones are over 10,000 years old, but no evidence of the formation being that old.
Non of your references mention with any certainty what you have claimed as fact in the first sentence of your paragraph..